Risk communication with pictographs: The role of numeracy and graph processing

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 3

Abstract

We conducted three studies to investigate how well pictographs communicate medical screening information to persons with higher and lower numeracy skills. In Study 1, we conducted a 2 (probability level: higher vs. lower) x 2 (reference information: yes vs. no) x 2 (subjective numeracy: higher vs. lower) between-subjects design. Persons with higher numeracy skills were influenced by probability level but not by reference information. Persons with lower numeracy tended to differentiate between a higher and a lower probability when there was no reference information. Study 2 consisted of interviews about the mental processing of pictographs. Higher numeracy was associated with counting the icons and relying on numbers depicted in the graph. Study 3 was an experiment with the same design as in Study 1, but, rather than using reference information, we varied the sequence of task type (counting first vs. non-counting first) to explore the role of the focus on numerical information. Persons with lower numeracy differentiated between higher and lower risk only when they were in the non-counting first condition. Task sequence did not influence the risk perceptions of persons with higher numeracy. In sum, our results suggest that pictographs may be useful for persons with higher and lower numeracy. However, these groups seem to process the graph differently. Persons with higher numeracy rely more on the numerical information depicted in the graph, whereas persons with lower numeracy seem to be confused when they are guided towards these numbers.

Authors and Affiliations

Rebecca Hess, Vivianne H. M. Visschers, and Michael Siegrist

Keywords

Related Articles

Identifying decision strategies in a consumer choice situation

In two studies on mobile phone purchase decisions, we investigated consumers’ decision strategies with a newly developed process tracing tool called InterActive Process Tracing (IAPT). This tool is a combination of sever...

Better is worse, worse is better: Reexamination of violations of dominance in intertemporal choice

Recently, Scholten and Read (2014) found new violations of dominance in intertemporal choice. Although adding a small receipt before a delayed payment or adding a small delayed receipt after an immediate receipt makes th...

Sequential evidence accumulation in decision making: The individual desired level of confidence can explain the extent of information acquisition

Judgments and decisions under uncertainty are frequently linked to a prior sequential search for relevant information. In such cases, the subject has to decide when to stop the search for information. Evidence accumulati...

Risks deter but pleasures allure: Is pleasure more important?

The pursuit of unhealthy behaviors, such as smoking or binge drinking, not only carries various downside risks, but also provides pleasure. A parsimonious model, used in the literature to explain the decision to pursue a...

Gender differences in lying in sender-receiver games: A meta-analysis

Whether there are gender differences in lying has been largely debated in the past decade. Previous studies found mixed results. To shed light on this topic, here I report a meta-analysis of 8,728 distinct observations,...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677797
  • DOI -
  • Views 134
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Rebecca Hess, Vivianne H. M. Visschers, and Michael Siegrist (2011). Risk communication with pictographs: The role of numeracy and graph processing. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(3), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677797