„Separatyzm donbaski” jako technologia geopolityczna

Journal Title: Wschodni Rocznik Humanistyczny - Year 2017, Vol 0, Issue 4

Abstract

The article analyzes the nature and essence of “Donbas separa¬tism”, its internal and external factors. The author proves that despite the existence of a specific territorial identity in Donbas, the “Donbas separatism” lacks the key features of “classical” separatism – namely, historic background, ethnic or religious basis, more or less stable political movement for seces¬sion, controversy over territorial affiliation in the past etc. At the same time, the article shows that the regional identity and territorial patriotism, which are based primarily on social grounds, inherent for an industrial region, were cultivated and emphasized by the local political and business elites for ideological justification of their domination in the region and mobilizing the population in the electoral struggle against political rivals. However, the direct implementation of secession actions, which was (and still is) accom¬panied by an armed confrontation, became possible only after the interven¬tion of the Russian Federation, which applied a whole arsenal of hybrid war¬fare, including informational, propagandistic, political, humanitarian, military and sabotage means. According to the author, the “Donbas separatism” has become a geopolitical technology of Kremlin within the framework of the hybrid aggression against Ukraine in order to maintain its influence by sup¬porting a permanent “hotspot” or a frozen conflict in Eastern Ukraine. In this sense the quasi-states of “Donetsk People’s Republic” and “Luhansk People’s Republic” play the role of new limitrophes, through which Russia will try to block internal and international political steps of Ukraine that are disadvan¬tageous from the Russian point of view.

Authors and Affiliations

Serhij Pakhomenko

Keywords

Related Articles

«С ызвестными тремя господами имел я лишь только теперь… конференцию»: «конспекты» А.И. Остермана как уникальный источник в делопроизводстве XVIII в.

In the first quarter of the 18th century was established a new state management system in Russia and the rules of its functioning were written down. One of the basic acts containing these principles was the “General Regl...

Nauczanie nauk pomocniczych historii na Uniwersytecie Zielonogórskim – obserwacje z perspektywy małego ośrodka akademickiego

The article describes the didactics of the auxiliary sciences of history at the Institute of History of the University of Zielona Góra, since the establishment of the Department of Auxiliary Sciences of History in 2000....

Cesarz i filozof: postawa Marka Aureliusza wobec chrześcijan

The following chapter concerns the Christians' martyrdom during the reign of Marcus Aurerlius. The aim of this chapter is to analyse the attitude of Marcus Aurelius towards the Christians. In order to understand his moti...

Dydaktyczne aspekty nauk pomocniczych historii na Uniwersytecie Rzeszowskim

The article describes one of the youngest departments of the auxiliary sciences of history in Poland. The author also presents structure of the department and the scientific achievements of the scientists employed there....

Nauki pomocnicze historii XIX i XX w. jako przedmiot kształcenia studentów historii Akademii im. Jana Długosza w Częstochowie

The article describes in detail the elements of didactics of the auxiliary sciences of history of the 19th and 20th centuries in the Jan Dlugosz Academy in Częstochowa: teaching subjects, literature and learning programs...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP373538
  • DOI -
  • Views 146
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Serhij Pakhomenko (2017). „Separatyzm donbaski” jako technologia geopolityczna. Wschodni Rocznik Humanistyczny, 0(4), 115-127. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-373538