Social, Societal, Social Work and Psychological as Understood by Academic Social Workers – Towards the Phenomena-Based Disciplinary Identities  

Abstract

The article presents research that studies social, societal, social work and psychological as phenomena. It focuses on them not as definitions or conceptualizations but as on the experienced and understood. The theoretical approach is phenomenology. The study has three research questions. First question is the following: What are general structures of social, societal, social work and psychological as phenomena? Secondly, what is the common structure of all four subjects as phenomenon? And, thirdly, what is their unique structure? The research material consists of the results provided by two earlier studies that focused on the understanding of social, societal, social work and psychological in Lithuania and Finland. The research material was analyzed by eight methodical steps that combined traditional content analysis and phenomenological analysis. The article describes the process of analysis in detail. The analysis reveals that all four subjects are the same phenomenon because of their contextual and interactional structure. Besides their common structure, social work and societal have most common features. Social work illustrates itself fundamentally more as work than as social. Concerning the unique structures, psychological appears as the most distinct phenomenon. Social work manifests itself particularly as a work with goals. Societal does not have anything unique. The results are discussed in the frame of disciplinary identities and possibilities for true multi-professionalism and interdisciplinary research. The phenomena-based results show that there is less co-operation between the subjects and disciplines than could and should be.  

Authors and Affiliations

Juha Perttula, Anna Väänänen, Gedas Malinauskas, Jūratė Gudliauskaitė-Godvadė, Paulius Godvadas

Keywords

Related Articles

 Gyvenimo kokybė: sąvokos apibrėžimas ir santykis su gero gyvenimo terminais

Straipsnyje analizuojamas gyvenimo kokybės apibrėžimas ir termino santykis su kitomis gero gyvenimo sąvokomis: „gerovė“ (angl. welfare), „gerbūvis“ (angl. well-being), „gyvenimo standar- tas“ (angl. standard of living)....

 Mediciniškai nepaaiškinami negalavimai ir paciento elgsena sveikatos priežiūros sistemos atžvilgiu: prastos savijautos socialinio pateisinimo paieškos

Dabarties visuomenėse daugėja fizinių negalavimų, kuriuos sunku paaiškinti me­ diciniškai (MNN), nes jie stokoja aiškios patologijos. MNN prisikiriami tokie negalavimai: ilgą laiką trunkantis nuovargis, įvairaus pobūdžio...

Alkoholio vartojimo ir priklausomybės nuo alkoholio sąvokų apibrėžties problematika: socialinės dimensijos įtraukties aspektas

Žalingas alkoholio vartojimas yra didelė socialinė problema, ypač Europoje. Kada alkoholio vartojimas pasidaro žalingas, kada išsivysto alkoholinė priklausomybė, yra pagrindinis tyrimo klausimas. Straipsnio tikslas – iša...

 „W2.0“ viešoji erdvė: kinų diskursas Lietuvos „W2.0“ savilaidoj

Pagrindinis straipsnio tikslas yra išskirti Lietuvos gyventojų nacionalinio identiteto, repre- zentuojamo virtualioje erdvėje, pokyčius etninio kitoniškumo atžvilgiu. Šiam tikslui pasiekti buvo nagrinėjama „W2.0“ virtual...

Rethinking Social Exclusion and Social Suffering

The article rethinks the concepts of social exclusion and social suffering by discussing them with regard to the categories of power, normativity, subjective wellbeing, livable life and identities based on trauma and vul...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP124281
  • DOI -
  • Views 73
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Juha Perttula, Anna Väänänen, Gedas Malinauskas, Jūratė Gudliauskaitė-Godvadė, Paulius Godvadas (2010). Social, Societal, Social Work and Psychological as Understood by Academic Social Workers – Towards the Phenomena-Based Disciplinary Identities  . KultŁ«ra ir visuomenė. SocialiniŁ³ tyrimŁ³ Ł¾urnalas, 1(2), 101-130. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-124281