Szczęśliwość człowieka mierzona stanem jego wolności. Człowiek w społeczeństwie kapitalistycznym

Journal Title: Amor Fati - Year 2015, Vol 1, Issue 1

Abstract

Freedom is a multidimensional concept. It can be understood in many ways, which are often dependent on the ideological mainstream of thought of the era. On the one hand, freedom can be commonly understood as doing what one wants. On the other hand, you can argue about it as an example of inner freedom e.g. absolute freedom by Jean Paul Sartre. Another time, it is perceived in the aspect of external freedom such as political freedom. For John Stuart Mill and Isaiah Berlin political freedom was freedom in the liberal sense. Isaiah Berlin distinguished it on the positive freedom ("to") and negative freedom ("from"). Freedom has to be the source of human autonomy, individualism, the liberty of physical and intellectual development, i.e. not forced action at will. Thus understood freedom makes a man happy. It makes him the owner of a very valuable thing too: the ability of making choices. One should ask a fundamental question: does every human have the same freedom? As history shows, unfortunately, not every man is free to the same extent. As a result of labor division - since ancient times - the society evolved to class division; the rulers and the subjects. In this study, I intended to demonstrate that egalitarianism, of which people solicited wherever class inequality dominated (eg. slavery, feudalism, capital-ism, etc.) does not always go hand in hand with freedom. Egalitarianism may be the source of the formation of political paternalism - as in the case of communism in terms of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. In the twenty-first century, in the era of consumerism, despite the dominance of pluralism and relative equality, it is still hard to talk about any kind of freedom. Zygmunt Bauman wrote about how people, inundated with variety of offers of consumerist market, become just slaves to the great commercial companies. Freedom is identified with buying i.e. the constant picking from vast range of goods and services. Those who do not meet the requirements of being active consumers, are excluded from consumerism community - becoming, according to Zygmunt Bauman, “the new poor”, unhappy people.

Authors and Affiliations

Anna M. Dreko

Keywords

Related Articles

„Performuj albo giń”. Przystanek Woodstock jako performans kulturowy

Performance is an occurrence commonly associated with theater, but that concept has a very broad context. Nowadays there are a lot of phenomena we can perceive this way, not just theatrical or quasi-theatrical. If we ass...

Czy eugenika felicytologiczna jest w ogóle możliwa?

This article tries to answer the question: is felicitous eugenics and creating people by genes manipulation a dan-gerous thing? It is a utopia or it is a new hope? Habermas and Fukuyama are convinced that it leads us to...

Mind uploading. Transhumanistyczna wizja umysłu

The idea of mind uploading or mind transfer is based on a mechanistic and materialistic perception of the mind. One version of artificial intelligence theory and computer functionalism proclaims that even computers can h...

Śmierć w literaturze i kulturze dziecięcej, czyli o problemach dziecięcej tanatologii

In the literature for children and young people have always existed taboo topics. One of them is the problem of death and suffering. Topics considered by an adult to be difficult, it doesn’t have to be this same for a ch...

Performatywność wstrętu w teatrze współczesnym

The article is an attempt to analyze the performative aesthetic category of disgust. The author of the text uses the examples from dramas of in-yer-face theater. The specificity of this current (accumulation of cruelty,...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP213640
  • DOI -
  • Views 115
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Anna M. Dreko (2015). Szczęśliwość człowieka mierzona stanem jego wolności. Człowiek w społeczeństwie kapitalistycznym. Amor Fati, 1(1), 31-49. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-213640