Szczęśliwość człowieka mierzona stanem jego wolności. Człowiek w społeczeństwie kapitalistycznym
Journal Title: Amor Fati - Year 2015, Vol 1, Issue 1
Abstract
Freedom is a multidimensional concept. It can be understood in many ways, which are often dependent on the ideological mainstream of thought of the era. On the one hand, freedom can be commonly understood as doing what one wants. On the other hand, you can argue about it as an example of inner freedom e.g. absolute freedom by Jean Paul Sartre. Another time, it is perceived in the aspect of external freedom such as political freedom. For John Stuart Mill and Isaiah Berlin political freedom was freedom in the liberal sense. Isaiah Berlin distinguished it on the positive freedom ("to") and negative freedom ("from"). Freedom has to be the source of human autonomy, individualism, the liberty of physical and intellectual development, i.e. not forced action at will. Thus understood freedom makes a man happy. It makes him the owner of a very valuable thing too: the ability of making choices. One should ask a fundamental question: does every human have the same freedom? As history shows, unfortunately, not every man is free to the same extent. As a result of labor division - since ancient times - the society evolved to class division; the rulers and the subjects. In this study, I intended to demonstrate that egalitarianism, of which people solicited wherever class inequality dominated (eg. slavery, feudalism, capital-ism, etc.) does not always go hand in hand with freedom. Egalitarianism may be the source of the formation of political paternalism - as in the case of communism in terms of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. In the twenty-first century, in the era of consumerism, despite the dominance of pluralism and relative equality, it is still hard to talk about any kind of freedom. Zygmunt Bauman wrote about how people, inundated with variety of offers of consumerist market, become just slaves to the great commercial companies. Freedom is identified with buying i.e. the constant picking from vast range of goods and services. Those who do not meet the requirements of being active consumers, are excluded from consumerism community - becoming, according to Zygmunt Bauman, “the new poor”, unhappy people.
Authors and Affiliations
Anna M. Dreko
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP213640
- DOI -
- Views 127
- Downloads 0
Źródła i funkcje państwa w myśli Fryderyka Nietzschego: wielość niewolniczych tendencji a jedność egzystencji „wolnych duchów”
The article presents the sources and functions of the state in the thought of Friedrich Nietzsche. Nietzsche claims that modern society is overfilled by a multitude of slavish tendencies, which stand in total opposition...
Witkacego filozofia kultury. Próba odczytania z perspektywy szkoły frankfurckiej
The article aims to discuss the Witkacy's philosophy of culture and save it in the concept of cultural industry developed by Horkheimer and Adorno. In the first part the Pole’s philosophy of culture is reconstructed, wit...
Po co w ogóle to całe filozofowanie?
-
Hegemonia oka?
The article contains a selection of ideas about the vision’s position in the Western Europe culture. The author aims to show historical process of building trust to this sensor and compare them with the nowadays conditio...
Królewskie palmy, drzewa świętojańskie, migdałowce w dolinie konsulów… Kilka refleksji na temat roślinności w twórczości Alberta Camusa
In this article the author argues that in the works of Camus people are particularly associated with vegetation. Joanna Roś analyzes the selected passages from the three literary works by Albert Camus, successively provi...