The decision paradoxes motivating Prospect Theory: The prevalence of the paradoxes increases with numerical ability

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2019, Vol 14, Issue 4

Abstract

Prospect Theory (PT: Kahneman & Tversky, 1979) of risky decision making is based on psychological phenomena (paradoxes) that motivate assumptions about how people react to gains and losses, and how they weight outcomes with probabilities. Recent studies suggest that people’s numeracy affect their decision making. We therefore conducted a large-scale conceptual replication of the seminal study by Kahneman and Tversky (1979), where we targeted participants with larger variability in numeracy. Because people low in numeracy may be more dependent on anchors in the form of other judgments we also manipulated design type (within-subject design, vs. single-stimuli design, where participants assess only one problem). The results from about 1,800 participants showed that design type had no effect on the modal choices. The rate of replication of the paradoxes in Kahneman and Tversky was poor and positively related to the participants’ numeracy. The Probabilistic Insurance Effect was observed at all levels of numeracy. The Reflection Effects were not fully replicated at any numeracy level. The Certainty and Isolation Effects explained by nonlinear probability weighting were replicated only at high numeracy. No participant exhibited all 9 paradoxes and more than 50% of the participants exhibited at most three of the 9 paradoxes. The choices by the participants with low numeracy were consistent with a shift towards a cautionary non-compensatory strategy of minimizing the risk of receiving the worst possible outcome. We discuss the implications for the psychological assumptions of PT.

Authors and Affiliations

Philip Millroth, Håkan Nilsson and Peter Juslin

Keywords

Related Articles

Debiasing egocentrism and optimism biases in repeated competitions

When judging their likelihood of success in competitive tasks, people tend to be overoptimistic for easy tasks and overpessimistic for hard tasks (the shared circumstance effect; SCE). Previous research has shown that fe...

Performance on the Cognitive Reflection Test is stable across time

A widely used measure of individual propensity to utilize analytic processing is the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT), a set of math problems with intuitively compelling but incorrect answers. Here, we ask whether scores...

From foe to friend and back again: The temporal dynamics of intra-party bias in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election

Political identification is the basis of enduring conflict, suggesting that political attitudes are difficult to change. Here we show that in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election, political identities underwent modificati...

The effect of incentive structure on search in the secretary problem

We tested the effectiveness of performance-based incentive structures using three incentive structures — commission base, best only and flat fee — and two levels of context — no context and house-selling — in an experime...

Ambiguity and expectation-neglect in dilemmas of interpersonal trust

Recent research suggests that people discount or neglect expectations of reciprocity in trust dilemmas. We examine the underlying processes and boundary conditions of this effect, finding that expectations have stronger...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678433
  • DOI -
  • Views 120
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Philip Millroth, Håkan Nilsson and Peter Juslin (2019). The decision paradoxes motivating Prospect Theory: The prevalence of the paradoxes increases with numerical ability. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(4), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678433