The difference between conceptual world image and language conceptualization of surrounding world

Abstract

The article deals with issues connected with language conceptualization of surrounding world which is kept in language units and affects human thinking.

Authors and Affiliations

А. Я. Середницька

Keywords

Related Articles

The peculiarities of functional and stylistic usage of rhetorical questions, analyzed on the material of journalistic discourse by Irina Kalynets

This article deals with the functional and stylistic features of rhetorical questions, analyzed on the material of journalistic discourse by Irina Kalynets. This article considers their peculiarities, analyzes the variou...

Roles and Masks in Communication Activity of a Lawyer

The review of roles and masks that are made during the communication activity of the lawyer during the trial, and define the peculiarities of language behavior and influence on the choice of communicative strategies and...

Shevchenko’s ideas in the life and work of Julian Romanchuk

This article reveals the role and significance of Shevchenko’s ideas in the political, pedagogical, publishing and educational activities of Y. Romanchuk. Some attention is paid to the advantages and disadvantages of She...

Linguistic and communicative features of Greek tourism discourse

The article deals with the linguistic and communicative peculiarities of Greek tourism discourse, the communicative purpose of Greek travel newspaper articles is defined, their compositional structure is analyzed.

Language means of expressiveness of linguocultural type «der deutsche Bürger»

The article states the language means of expressiveness of linguocultural type «der deutsche Bürger» as well as takes into consideration their intensity.

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP454695
  • DOI -
  • Views 539
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

А. Я. Середницька (2016). The difference between conceptual world image and language conceptualization of surrounding world. Науковий вісник Міжнародного гуманітарного університету. Серія «Філологія», 21(1), 69-71. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-454695