The role of the origin (automatic vs. reflective) of affective state for the effectiveness of persuasion based on strong vs. weak arguments

Journal Title: Roczniki Psychologiczne - Year 2018, Vol 21, Issue 1

Abstract

Previous research has focused on the influence of emotional valence on the effectiveness of per-suasion via the central route or the peripheral route. The purpose of this study was to answer the question of whether other dimensions of emotion, such as the origin of emotional charge (auto-matic vs. reflective) may also influence the effectiveness of persuasion. It was expected that reflective emotions would increase susceptibility to strong arguments, while automatic emotions would result in a lack of sensitivity to the quality of arguments. Emotional words of proven emotional quality were used to elicit affective states. They were chosen in order to contrast the different levels of emotional valence (negative, neutral, and positive) and the origin of emotion (automatic and reflective). It turned out that in the case of reflective conditions, a significantly higher effectiveness of persuasion was observed for strong arguments than for weak ones. In the case of automatic conditions, there was no difference in the effectiveness of persuasion depending on the quality of the arguments. There were also no differences related to emotional valence; however, the manipulation of affective states on emotional valence dimension turned out not to be effective. This suggests that the origin of emotion can be considered a factor influencing processing via the central or peripheral route to persuasion.

Authors and Affiliations

Magdalena T. Walkowiak, Kamil K. Imbir

Keywords

Related Articles

The Role of Time Delay in Memory Conformity

Memory conformity occurs when one person’s memory report influences another person’s subsequent report concerning the same event. In the study, we tested whether an increase in the time between a discussion of the event...

Kiedy potrzeba domknięcia sprzyja złożonemu poznaniu

Teoria naiwnego poznania jest jednym z najbardziej wpływowych podejść opisujących proces nabywania wiedzy. Zgodnie z nią o przebiegu procesu epistemicznego decyduje w pierwszej kolejności motywacja do uzyskania domknięci...

Post-Stapelian psychology. Discussions on the reliability of data and publications in psychology

In 2011, Diederik Stapel's fraud was discovered. It turned out that not only did Stapel forge data but also journals failed to notice many obvious errors and encouraged distortions (e.g., not report-ing studies with non-...

Personality traits and two dimensions of forgivingness

Although personality characteristics have been conceptualized as influencing individuals’ propensity to forgive, the findings in this field are inconsistent and require further studies. The five-factor model has been exp...

Dyskusja „po Stapelu” wokół rzetelności badań i publikacji w psychologii

W roku 2011 wykryto oszustwo Diederika Stapela. Okazało się, że nie tylko Stapel fałszował dane, lecz także czasopisma nie dostrzegły wielu oczywistych błędów oraz zachęcały do przekłamań (np. pomijania badań z wynikami...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP669275
  • DOI 10.18290/rpsych.2018.21.1-2
  • Views 92
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Magdalena T. Walkowiak, Kamil K. Imbir (2018). The role of the origin (automatic vs. reflective) of affective state for the effectiveness of persuasion based on strong vs. weak arguments. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 21(1), 9-33. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-669275