Using hierarchical Bayesian methods to examine the tools of decision-making

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 8

Abstract

Hierarchical Bayesian methods offer a principled and comprehensive way to relate psychological models to data. Here we use them to model the patterns of information search, stopping and deciding in a simulated binary comparison judgment task. The simulation involves 20 subjects making 100 forced choice comparisons about the relative magnitudes of two objects (which of two German cities has more inhabitants). Two worked-examples show how hierarchical models can be developed to account for and explain the diversity of both search and stopping rules seen across the simulated individuals. We discuss how the results provide insight into current debates in the literature on heuristic decision making and argue that they demonstrate the power and flexibility of hierarchical Bayesian methods in modeling human decision-making.

Authors and Affiliations

Michael D. Lee and Benjamin R. Newell

Keywords

Related Articles

Making good cider out of bad apples — Signaling expectations boosts cooperation among would-be free riders

The present study investigates how group-cooperation heuristics boost voluntary contributions in a repeated public goods game. We manipulate two separate factors in a two-person public goods game: i) group composition (S...

How the number of options and perceived variety influence choice satisfaction: An experiment with prescription drug plans

This study measures the perceived costs, perceived benefits, choice outcome satisfaction, and choice process satisfaction from consumers making hypothetical choices amongst prescription drug plans. I juxtapose the number...

Psychological aspects of the rejection of recycled water: Contamination, purification and disgust

There is a worldwide and increasing shortage of potable fresh water. Modern water reclamation technologies can alleviate much of the problem by converting wastewater directly into drinking water, but there is public resi...

Top scores are possible, bottom scores are certain (and middle scores are not worth mentioning): A pragmatic view of verbal probabilities

In most previous studies of verbal probabilities, participants are asked to translate expressions such as possible and not certain into numeric probability values. This probabilistic translation approach can be contraste...

Are complex decisions better left to the unconscious? Further failed replications of the deliberation-without-attention effect

The deliberation-without-attention effect occurs when better decisions are made when people experience a period of distraction before a decision than when they make decisions immediately or when they spend time reflectin...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677866
  • DOI -
  • Views 151
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Michael D. Lee and Benjamin R. Newell (2011). Using hierarchical Bayesian methods to examine the tools of decision-making. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677866