Using hierarchical Bayesian methods to examine the tools of decision-making

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 8

Abstract

Hierarchical Bayesian methods offer a principled and comprehensive way to relate psychological models to data. Here we use them to model the patterns of information search, stopping and deciding in a simulated binary comparison judgment task. The simulation involves 20 subjects making 100 forced choice comparisons about the relative magnitudes of two objects (which of two German cities has more inhabitants). Two worked-examples show how hierarchical models can be developed to account for and explain the diversity of both search and stopping rules seen across the simulated individuals. We discuss how the results provide insight into current debates in the literature on heuristic decision making and argue that they demonstrate the power and flexibility of hierarchical Bayesian methods in modeling human decision-making.

Authors and Affiliations

Michael D. Lee and Benjamin R. Newell

Keywords

Related Articles

Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk

Although Mechanical Turk has recently become popular among social scientists as a source of experimental data, doubts may linger about the quality of data provided by subjects recruited from online labor markets. We addr...

Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow: Individual differences in future self-continuity account for saving

Some people find it more difficult to delay rewards than others. In three experiments, we tested a “future self-continuity” hypothesis that individual differences in the perception of one’s present self as continuous wit...

A note on determining the number of cues used in judgment analysis studies: The issue of type II error

Many judgment analysis studies employ multiple regression procedures to estimate the importance of cues. Some studies test the significance of regression coefficients in order to decide whether or not specific cues are a...

In the winning mood: Affect in the Iowa gambling task

The present research aimed to test the role of mood in the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT; Bechara et al., 1994). In the IGT, participants can win or lose money by picking cards from four different decks. They have to learn by...

A re-examination of the effect of contextual group size on people’s attitude to risk

Using Kahneman and Tversky’s life-death decision paradigm, Wang and colleagues (e.g., Wang & Johnston, 1995; Wang, 1996a, 1996b, 1996c, 2008; Wang et al., 2001) have shown two characteristic phenomena regarding people’s...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677866
  • DOI -
  • Views 162
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Michael D. Lee and Benjamin R. Newell (2011). Using hierarchical Bayesian methods to examine the tools of decision-making. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677866