Using hierarchical Bayesian methods to examine the tools of decision-making

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 8

Abstract

Hierarchical Bayesian methods offer a principled and comprehensive way to relate psychological models to data. Here we use them to model the patterns of information search, stopping and deciding in a simulated binary comparison judgment task. The simulation involves 20 subjects making 100 forced choice comparisons about the relative magnitudes of two objects (which of two German cities has more inhabitants). Two worked-examples show how hierarchical models can be developed to account for and explain the diversity of both search and stopping rules seen across the simulated individuals. We discuss how the results provide insight into current debates in the literature on heuristic decision making and argue that they demonstrate the power and flexibility of hierarchical Bayesian methods in modeling human decision-making.

Authors and Affiliations

Michael D. Lee and Benjamin R. Newell

Keywords

Related Articles

Investigating intuitive and deliberate processes statistically: The multiple-measure maximum likelihood strategy classification method

One of the core challenges of decision research is to identify individuals’ decision strategies without influencing decision behavior by the method used. Bröder and Schiffer (2003) suggested a method to classify decision...

A psychological law of inertia and the illusion of loss aversion

The principle of loss aversion is thought to explain a wide range of anomalous phenomena involving tradeoffs between losses and gains. In this article, I show that the anomalies loss aversion was introduced to explain -...

(When) are religious people nicer? Religious salience and the “Sunday Effect” on pro-social behavior

Prior research has found mixed evidence for the long-theorized link between religiosity and pro-social behavior. To help overcome this divergence, I hypothesize that pro-social behavior is linked not to religiosity per s...

MARTER: Markov True and Error Model of Drifting Parameters

This paper describes a theory of the variability of risky choice that describes empirical properties of choice data, including sequential effects and systematic violations of response independence. The Markov True and Er...

Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment

We designed an experiment to test the robustness of Dana, Weber, and Kuang’s (DWK), 2007 results. DWK observed that, when participants were given a “costless” way — the click of a button — to ignore the consequences of t...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677866
  • DOI -
  • Views 130
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Michael D. Lee and Benjamin R. Newell (2011). Using hierarchical Bayesian methods to examine the tools of decision-making. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677866