ВІДНОВЛЕННЯ ПОЗОВНОЇ ДАВНОСТІ: МЕЖІ СУДДІВСЬКОЇ ДИСКРЕЦІЇ

Abstract

restoration of limitation. The content of the legal concept of “restoring statute of limitations” is defined: it is not a renewal of the term, but a judicial defense of a right that has already lost its compulsory ability. It has been established that, in the implementation of protective legal protective measures in court, an important safeguard for achieving justice is compliance with the carrier of the right that is violated, the periods of harassment – limitation of action, and the responsibility of the jurisdictional body is to properly assess this fact and establish the circumstances associated with this temporal by category. It was found that such an action can be performed by a jurisdictional body only if there are valid reasons for the lender to skip the period of limitation. Thus, the restoration of limitation does not occur automatically, but only after the court has made an appropriate decision on the assessment of the respectfulness of actions not taken to exercise the substantive right to a claim during a specific limitation period. The factors that the court may qualify as important circumstances are studied. The limits of the use of judicial discretion in this process are revealed. Analyzed the issue of establishing the legal boundaries of determining the validity of reasons for the omission and their influence on the lapse of time. This, in particular, was done on the plane of review of court decisions and the possibility of reassessing the established facts of the importance or inadequacy of the omission of the limitation of actions. Also studied the question of the possibility of cancellation of the court decision on the grounds of improper restoration of the limitation of actions and, as a result, the illegal protection of civil law, which has already lost its compulsory ability. The obligation of the law enforcement authority is indicated to take into account important grounds for restoring prescription and thus contribute to the protection of the violated substantive law. After all, the rule of law indicates that in the case of a valid limitation of limitations, the violated right shall be protected. The phrase “subject to protection” does not leave room for a double interpretation of the content of this provision: the law enforcement body must restore the possibility of protection of the right. So the theory that the restoration of the right to defense relates to the rights of the court in assessing the importance of the circumstances that led to the omission of the limitation period is erroneous.

Authors and Affiliations

П. Д. Гуйван

Keywords

Related Articles

ВІЙСЬКОВІ АДМІНІСТРАЦІЇ ЯК ТИМЧАСОВІ ДЕРЖАВНІ ОРГАНИ З ЕЛЕМЕНТАМИ ВІЙСЬКОВОЇ ОРГАНІЗАЦІЇ УПРАВЛІННЯ У СКЛАДІ СЕКТОРУ БЕЗПЕКИ Й ОБОРОНИ УКРАЇНИ

The article deals with the issue of the military administrations belonging to state bodies within the security and defense sector of Ukraine. Military administrations may be formed in territories where martial law is imp...

ТЕОРЕТИКО-ПРАВОВІ ЗАСАДИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ РЕАЛІЗАЦІЇ АРЕШТОВАНОГО НЕРУХОМОГО МАЙНА ЧЕРЕЗ ЕЛЕКТРОННІ ТОРГИ

In the article the theoretical and legal principles of the procedure of realization of the arrested immovable property through electronic trading are researched. It was established that imposition of arrest on real estat...

ОХОРОНА ПРАВ ТА СВОБОД ДИТИНИ: МІЖНАРОДНИЙ ТА НАЦІОНАЛЬНИЙ АСПЕКТИ

The authors on the basis of analysis of normative-legal acts, international conventions present the current status of protection of the rights and freedoms of the child at international and national levels. It is noted t...

ПСИХОЛОГІЧНІ ОСОБЛИВОСТІ ШАХРАЙСТВА В МЕРЕЖІ ІНТЕРНЕТ

The article deals with the current state and psychological peculiarities of Internet fraud. The influence of Internet technologies on expansion of possibilities of Internet fraud has been determined. The psychological me...

ПОЛІТИКА ЗАБЕЗПЕЧЕННЯ ПРОДОВОЛЬЧОЇ БЕЗПЕКИ В НОВЕЛАХ ЗАКОНОДАВСТВА ДЕЯКИХ КРАЇН СВІТУ

The author examines recently approved recent legislation on food security and its components in some foreign countries, in particular: Belarus, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan. The favorable directions of the state policy concern...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP608040
  • DOI -
  • Views 49
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

П. Д. Гуйван (2018). ВІДНОВЛЕННЯ ПОЗОВНОЇ ДАВНОСТІ: МЕЖІ СУДДІВСЬКОЇ ДИСКРЕЦІЇ. Південноукраїнський правничий часопис, 4(1), 108-112. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-608040