Zakaz reformationis in peius w sprawach o zasiedzenie

Journal Title: Radca Prawny. Zeszyty naukowe - Year 2018, Vol 16, Issue 3

Abstract

The article undertakes an analysis of a controversial issue concerning the prohibition of reformatio in peius in cases of acquisitive prescription (usucaption). Acquisitive prescription matters are considered in non-litigious proceedings, hence the prohibition of reformatio in peius defined under article 384 of the Polish Civil Procedure Code applies therein only mutatis mutandis in accordance with Article 13(2) of the Civil Procedure Code. The article examines the existing case-law and the legal doctrine regarding the aforementioned prohibition and offers strong backing for its application. The supporting arguments cited include: lack of public interest in adjudicating such cases, a clear dispute between the parties to the proceedings, inadmissibility of the ex officio institution of proceedings for acquisitive prescription (without any motion by a party), and binding the court by the claim set out in the motion as to who may benefit from usucaption. The adversarial character of the proceedings for acquisitive prescription makes such matters similar in nature to litigious cases. Thus, their placing in the non-litigious category does not emanate from being non-adversarial. In fact, the opposite is very often true. Adjudication in non-litigious proceedings is the result of a decision made by the lawmakers, who have determined it appropriate despite the fact that adjudicating acquisitive prescription cases in litigious proceedings would be equally justified.

Authors and Affiliations

Marek Szymanowski

Keywords

Related Articles

Rola zagranicznego dokumentu urzędowego w sprawach o potwierdzenie posiadania obywatelstwa polskiego

This publication discusses one of the types of administrative proceedings conducted on the basis of the provisions of the Act of April 2, 2009 on Polish citizenship, i.e. cases concerning confirmation of Polish citizensh...

Dopuszczalne ograniczenia wolności myśli, sumienia i wyznania w orzecznictwie Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka – wybrane zagadnienia

Freedom of thought, conscience, and religion is a fundamental human right and, consequently, one of the foundations of democratic society. Initially, said freedom took the form of religious tolerance, i.e. acceptance of...

Świadczenie usług drogą elektroniczną i ochrona konsumenta w Sieci

The article addresses issues connected with entrepreneurs operating on the Internet. Firstly, it takes on compliance with the obligations arising from the Provision of Services by Electronic Means Act of 18 July 2002. Se...

Przegląd orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego oraz Trybunału Konstytucyjnego

The Polish Constitutional Tribunal issued an important decision regarding the exercise of the profession of an attorney-at-law, regarding the resolution of doubts as to the possibility of filing a complaint against the a...

Przegląd orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego

The Polish Supreme Court, in the field of criminal law, settled a significant dispute regarding the extraordinary mitigation of the penalty for a felony punished with a cumulative penalty of imprisonment and a fine. Th...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP595365
  • DOI -
  • Views 69
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Marek Szymanowski (2018). Zakaz reformationis in peius w sprawach o zasiedzenie. Radca Prawny. Zeszyty naukowe, 16(3), 85-102. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-595365