Zakaz reformationis in peius w sprawach o zasiedzenie

Journal Title: Radca Prawny. Zeszyty naukowe - Year 2018, Vol 16, Issue 3

Abstract

The article undertakes an analysis of a controversial issue concerning the prohibition of reformatio in peius in cases of acquisitive prescription (usucaption). Acquisitive prescription matters are considered in non-litigious proceedings, hence the prohibition of reformatio in peius defined under article 384 of the Polish Civil Procedure Code applies therein only mutatis mutandis in accordance with Article 13(2) of the Civil Procedure Code. The article examines the existing case-law and the legal doctrine regarding the aforementioned prohibition and offers strong backing for its application. The supporting arguments cited include: lack of public interest in adjudicating such cases, a clear dispute between the parties to the proceedings, inadmissibility of the ex officio institution of proceedings for acquisitive prescription (without any motion by a party), and binding the court by the claim set out in the motion as to who may benefit from usucaption. The adversarial character of the proceedings for acquisitive prescription makes such matters similar in nature to litigious cases. Thus, their placing in the non-litigious category does not emanate from being non-adversarial. In fact, the opposite is very often true. Adjudication in non-litigious proceedings is the result of a decision made by the lawmakers, who have determined it appropriate despite the fact that adjudicating acquisitive prescription cases in litigious proceedings would be equally justified.

Authors and Affiliations

Marek Szymanowski

Keywords

Related Articles

Niekonstytucyjność art. 8 ustawy o radcach prawnych

The provision of Article 8 of the Public Procurement Law Act is not in compliance with the Constitution of the Republic of Poland in terms of the scope, in which it provides for the majority of restrictions on the freedo...

Dopuszczalność zmiany przez pracownika roszczenia w toku postępowania z odwołania od rozwiązania umowy o pracę

This article addresses the issue of employees changing claims during the course of proceedings on appeal against termination of a contractual employment relationship. The direction of such changes may vary and is not lim...

Regulacja administracyjnych kar pieniężnych w Kodeksie postępowania administracyjnego po nowelizacji

The article addresses administrative fines as defined under the Administrative Procedure Code after the latest amendment, which went into force on June 1, 2017. By means of the aforementioned amendment, the statute was s...

Zwalczanie zorganizowanej przestępczości podatkowej z wykorzystaniem konstrukcji idealnego zbiegu czynów karalnych

The article address an issue important to the economic safety of the state, that is, effectively combating organized tax crime in the form of fraudulent transactions using invoices as part of so-called tax carousels or c...

Prawa i obowiązki radcy prawnego zatrudnionego w jednostkach samorządu terytorialnego

The author of the article performs a legal analysis of the issue of employing attorneys at law at units of local government, taking into consideration both the Attorneys at Law Act and the Local Government Employees Act....

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP595365
  • DOI -
  • Views 48
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Marek Szymanowski (2018). Zakaz reformationis in peius w sprawach o zasiedzenie. Radca Prawny. Zeszyty naukowe, 16(3), 85-102. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-595365