Zakaz reformationis in peius w sprawach o zasiedzenie
Journal Title: Radca Prawny. Zeszyty naukowe - Year 2018, Vol 16, Issue 3
Abstract
The article undertakes an analysis of a controversial issue concerning the prohibition of reformatio in peius in cases of acquisitive prescription (usucaption). Acquisitive prescription matters are considered in non-litigious proceedings, hence the prohibition of reformatio in peius defined under article 384 of the Polish Civil Procedure Code applies therein only mutatis mutandis in accordance with Article 13(2) of the Civil Procedure Code. The article examines the existing case-law and the legal doctrine regarding the aforementioned prohibition and offers strong backing for its application. The supporting arguments cited include: lack of public interest in adjudicating such cases, a clear dispute between the parties to the proceedings, inadmissibility of the ex officio institution of proceedings for acquisitive prescription (without any motion by a party), and binding the court by the claim set out in the motion as to who may benefit from usucaption. The adversarial character of the proceedings for acquisitive prescription makes such matters similar in nature to litigious cases. Thus, their placing in the non-litigious category does not emanate from being non-adversarial. In fact, the opposite is very often true. Adjudication in non-litigious proceedings is the result of a decision made by the lawmakers, who have determined it appropriate despite the fact that adjudicating acquisitive prescription cases in litigious proceedings would be equally justified.
Authors and Affiliations
Marek Szymanowski
Glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z 20 grudnia 2017 r., I CSK 160/17
This article presents commentary on the judgement of the Polish Supreme Court of December 20, 2017, in which the possibility of instituting proceedings for the establishment of non-existence of a resolution of a general...
Odpowiedzialność dyscyplinarna radców prawnych. Wybrane aspekty konstytucyjne i międzynarodowe
The aim of this study is to present a synthetic analysis of selected constitutional and international aspects of the disciplinary liability of attorneys-at-law. The issues discussed in this study concern three thematic a...
Гарантии соблюдения разумных сроков рассмотрения дела и процессуальные механизмы борьбы с затягиванием судебного процесса
In the article, the author reveals the legal nature of a reasonable timeframe for the consideration of a case as the basic guarantee of the right to a fair trial, as well as main procedural mechanisms to combat the protr...
Refleksje o wybranych kompetencjach organu ochrony danych osobowych, przed i po 25 maja 2018 r.
The article addresses selected key issues concerning the powers of the authority for personal data protection (supervisory authority) in light of amendments introduced by way of the General Data Protection Regulation (GD...
Od redakcji
Szanowni Państwo, oddajemy wam kolejny, dziewiętnasty już numer czasopisma „Radca Prawny. Zeszyty Naukowe”. Jako Redakcja chcemy, aby nasze publikacje były dla Państwa jednym ze źródeł informacji wykorzystywanych nie ty...