A СOMPARATIVE STUDY OF NIKOLAY YEVSHAN’S AND NIKOLAY GUMILEV’S LITERARY CRITICISM: AXIOLOGIICAL ASPECTS

Abstract

The article examines and explains the common aesthetic axiology of Nikolay Yevshan and Nikolay Gumilev, literary critics of the main mode of modernistic consciousness in the Ukrainian and Russian literature of the 10-s years of the 20th century. The comparative perspective of the study of the critic’s literal-critical system is consistent with the inten-tions of their critical consciousness. The term used by Gumilev in his aesthetic declarations to the experience of the writers of the preceding cultural epochs (Shakespeare, Rabelais, Villon and Gautier) is considered by me as an indica-tor of the cultural and aesthetic mode of his critical consciousness. Gumilev prefers an ontological approach the exis-tential questions in the work of these writers, which they associated with the pathos of beauty and wisdom. The issues of Yevshan’s aesthetic program are determined by his position as citizen, a patriot with a national idea. The axiological reference point for the critic was the work and the position of Taras Shevchenko. Yevshan’s typological criticism status in modern literary criticism has not been clearly defined yet. The analysis allows to draw certain conclusions. Obvious-ly, the literary critics of the 10-s years came from the general setting of modernism axiology on the productive absorp-tion of certain ontological, aesthetic and poetic experience of previous literary trends and individual writers. The com-parative analysis of the literary-critical concepts of Yevshan and Gumilev in the 10-s years helps to determine the prox-imity of aesthetic strategies, given by certain cultural-historical and ethnomental intentions of critical consciousness.

Authors and Affiliations

N. Spodarets

Keywords

Related Articles

TO THE PROBLEM OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT VISUALIZATION OF CHARACTERS AS THE METHOD OF CHARACTER CREATION (BASED ON THE STORY «THREE LAMENTS OVER STEPAN» BY GRYGIR TYUTYUNNIK)

The subject of analysis is the artistic techniques of characters creation which used by Grygir Tyutyunnyk, prominent Ukrainian writer, in the story «Three laments over Stepan». The topic of research: direct and indirect...

THE BIBLE INTERTEXT IN «THE WORD ABOUT LAW AND GRACE» BY ILARION

The article «The Bible intertext in «The Word about Law and Grace» by Ilarion» focuses on studying the influence of the Bible on the formation of the medieval preaching. The goals of the research work are bringing to lig...

FANTASY AS A MEANS OF INNER EMIGRATION IN THE WRITING OF HOPE MIRRLEES

The article deals with the life and writing of the British writer Hope Mirrlees, as well as the reasons and specifics of her inner emigration. Mirrlees‟s writing has only recently gained literary scholars‟ attention but...

MEANS OF SACRALIZATION OF IMAGE OF THE MOTHERLAND IN UKRAINIAN-CANADIAN POETRY OF THE SECOND HALF OF THE 20TH CENTURY

History of the Ukrainian Diaspora in Canada demonstrates active development of Ukrainian literature. The main sub-ject in emigration poetry is the theme of motherland-Ukraine. An appeal to it is the expression of spiritu...

THE POEM «PROROK» («PROPHET») BY A. PUSHKIN AND POEMS BY M. VINGRANOVSKY: INHERITANCE OF IDEAS AND VERSIFICATION TRADITIONS

Poet’s choice of some meter is actually one of the most interesting problems of verse studies. Modern scholars confirm historical relation between meter and sense of a poem. All meters, being used by predecessors, collec...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP231953
  • DOI -
  • Views 116
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

N. Spodarets (2016). A СOMPARATIVE STUDY OF NIKOLAY YEVSHAN’S AND NIKOLAY GUMILEV’S LITERARY CRITICISM: AXIOLOGIICAL ASPECTS. Наукові праці. Серія "Філологія. Літературознавство", 277(265), 76-79. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-231953