Аналіз організованості біогеоценозів

Journal Title: Питання біоіндикації та екології - Year 2016, Vol 21, Issue 1

Abstract

In general methodology orderliness as a phenomenon of the existence of any system, describes them in static, and the organization is considered to be a security process. Orderliness is a property of different systems, their parts, components, elements and describes the states of discreteness, decomposition, differentiation, structuredness, ordering, disorder of a system of relationships, functioning, adaptability which exist in biogeocoenosis. Orderliness reflects a particular point of the process of organization and indicators of biogeocoenosis that determining its stability on the basis of providing structures and particular stage of development. There are different types of orderliness. We consider orderliness to be a variety or a set of forms which express structure, dynamics, distribution and evolution of biogeocoenosis. The analysis enables the orderliness to expand the understanding of the structure of biogeocoenosis. In any orderliness biogeocoenosis is determining the geochemical differentiation of the subordination of the body: biotic, biogenic and inert substances. Inherent to these bodies various chemical elements in qualitative, quantitative combinations and masses reflect the geochemical orderliness of biogeocenosis, its specific and nonspecific features within the composition of the geochemistry of a particular landscape. Dynamic geochemical aspect of orderliness is biogeochemical orderliness that studies the structure of living organisms, their grouping and phenomena, processes that occur with the participation of living organisms in nature, including the formation of chemical compounds, biogenic migration of chemical elements in biogeochemical cycles. Biogeochemical orderliness is seamlessly integrated in the overall chemical orderliness and capacity of biogeocoenosis. In general, chemical orderliness of biogeocoenosis includes biochemical orderliness, operating with multiple biochemical compounds, many of which are specific for each biogeocoenosis. The chemical orderliness and its forms are united in a single biogeocenotical process of intravital (in vivo) and postmortem (in necro) biological technologies of formation, reaction, interaction and decomposition of chemical substanses. Spatial orderliness characterizes the body shape of the biogeocenosis and of its constituent bodies, especially their surfaces, the natural spatial arrangement of parts of biogeocenosis, their dimensions, contacts, vertical and horizontal decompositions, interpenetrations, combinations and compositions of species of different kingdoms of nature. Functional integration of orderliness is expressed by nonspecific and specific functions of the bodies that compose biogeocoenosis: body-forming for the entire biogeocoenosis and its parts; environment-forming, absorptive, excretory, throughput, etc., including specific production, mass-energy. The hierarchy of the functional orderliness of biogeocoenosis is found in subordinate levels of accumulation, transformation and migration of solar energy. It is expressed through chains and nets of interdependent existence. Activation of biogeocoenosis orderliness determines the balance of organisms’ states of vital activity in the populations of different kingdoms of nature, and ontogenetic orderliness describes the spectrum of age-related classes of organisms within the capabilities of their determination. In the discrete orderliness biogeocoenosis is analyzed in its taxonomic orderliness generally as well as within each kingdom of nature, primarily with the allocation of species and populations. Conclusions. 1. The orderliness can be analyzed from different perspectives of the scientific view on biogeocoenosis. 2. Discreteness of biogeocoenosis is uncertain (requires further study). Статья посвящена анализу организованности биогеоценозов. Доказано, что организованность можно анализировать с разных позиций научного видения биогеоценоза.

Authors and Affiliations

Ворошилова1, Е. О. Євтушенко 2, Я. В. Маленко2, Л. В. Шанда 3 N. V. Voroshilova1, E. O. Yevtushenko2, Ya. V. Malenko2, L. V. Shanda3

Keywords

Related Articles

Репродуктивні особливості Gleditsia triacanthos L. та Fraxinus excelsior L. за умов техногенного забруднення (REPRODUCTIVE FEATURES OF GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS L. AND FRAXINUS EXCELSIOR L. IN TERMS OF TECHNOGENIC POLLUTION)

Among the ecological problems of present time especially important are researches of reaction of vegetable organisms on the toxic action of organic compounds, the source of which are industrial enterprises and especially...

МОРФОФУНКЦІОНАЛЬНІ ЗМІНИ ЩИТОПОДІБНОЇ ЗАЛОЗИ В УМОВАХ ТРИВАЛОЇ ДІЇ ПЕСТИЦИДУ 2,4 Д

With organometric and histometric researches the study of morphometric parameters of thyroid laboratory white rats of different age groups in normal and prolonged exposure to the pesticide. The dependence of morphologica...

Сучасний стан дендрофлори парку культури і відпочинку м. Вільногірськ Дніпропетровської області

The species diversity, taxonomic indices and the living condition of the woody plantations in the culture and recreation park in Vilnohirsk has been studied. It is established, that 1003 specimens grow on the territory o...

Едафотопи терникових біогеоценозів, зростаючих на колишніх землях природних байрачних лісів та їх еколого-мікроморфологічна характеристика

In the given article, eco-micromorfologic characteristics and micromorfologic peculiarities of edaphotopes of thorny phytocoenosis are discussed.According to the article, a special attention is paid to the micromorfologi...

Біометричні характеристики пагонів Piceae pungens за дії промислового забруднення

The paper studies the influence of integrated pollution emission from vehicles and industrial enterprises on biometric indicators of annual shoots of the blue spruce Picea pungens Engelm (f. viridis Regel.) in the condit...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP308385
  • DOI -
  • Views 133
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ворошилова1, Е. О. Євтушенко 2, Я. В. Маленко2, Л. В. Шанда 3 N. V. Voroshilova1, E. O. Yevtushenko2, Ya. V. Malenko2, L. V. Shanda3 (2016). Аналіз організованості біогеоценозів. Питання біоіндикації та екології, 21(1), 3-12. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-308385