Communication levels in lyrical and poetic discourse
Journal Title: Вісник Харківського національного університету імені В.Н. Каразіна: Серія «Іноземна філологія. Методика викладання іноземних мов» - Year 2018, Vol 87, Issue
Abstract
<p>The article presents a concept of poetic text analysis from the perspective of speech act theory which distinguishes not two (as recognized in communicative pragmatic studies), but three levels of communication in lyrical and poetic discourse. These types are: 1) aesthetic communication; 2) external/vertical communication “author – reader” which appears as is or as "author – protagonist" or "protagonist – reader"; 3) internal/horizontal communication "character 1 – character 2". Being primary in poetic text, aesthetic communication is based on self-reference and the author’s aesthetic intention, whereas vertical and horizontal communications rely on reference per se and the author's referential intention. Thus, poetic text simultaneously realizes two speech acts – a poetic one (self-referential) and a general one (referential). Referential intention determines the speaker’s attitude towards the given content, and the aesthetic one – towards the word form used to convey this content. Poetic speech act is a subtype of expressive illocutionary act and introduces realization of the aesthetic intention which is seen in the author's illocutionary goal – to express true positive emotional evaluative attitude towards the word form being created, as well as the perlocutionary goal of affecting the reader's aesthetic feelings regarding the word form. Being interdependent and -related, the author’s referential and aesthetic intentions are reflected both at the level of utterance and text. The suggested concept is developed on examples of linguistic pragmatic interpretation of "New objectivity" poetry texts by M. Kaléko, E. Kästner and J. Ringelnatz.</p>
Authors and Affiliations
Л. Безугла
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP458261
- DOI -
- Views 142
- Downloads 0
Functional and linguosemiotic factors of reproducing artlangs in translation
<p>The article is dedicated to determining functional and linguosemiotic characteristics of artlangs as factors of their translation. Artlangs are defined as artificially created languages that function in literary disco...
Specific Features of Literature Discourse and its Aspects
<p>The article provides insights into the nature of literature discourse and its cognitive and communicative aspects. This type of discourse is viewed as cognitive-communicative interaction between the author and the rea...
Bimodal tweettexts as a communicative unit of the Internet genre of twitting exemplified by Donald Trump’s Twitter
<p>The article investigates bimodal tweet-texts as a unit of communication in the Internet genre of twitting, which is generated on the Twitter platform. It provides a definition of a bimodal tweet-text as a communicativ...
Rendering Biblical proper names into English and Ukrainian a comparative aspect
<p class="western" lang="uk-UA" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">The article deals with the comparative characteristics of rendering...
Intertextuality and the role of semantic markers in the translation of specialized sociological texts
<p class="western" lang="uk-UA" align="justify"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-GB">The article deals with intertextuality in the translation aspect. T...