DEFINITION OF THE ESSENCE OF THE CONCEPTS “LIMITATIONS” AND “PROHIBITIONS” IN THE FIELD OF WARNING OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENSES RELATED TO CORRUPTION

Abstract

The legislation of Ukraine regulating public relations in the field of civil service and prevention of corruption-related administrative offenses uses such notions as “limitations” and “prohibitions”, provides for their list. The scope of prevention of an administrative offense related to corruption in its essence and content is an integrated and multidimensional sphere, since it contains a large number of elements as well as tangible concepts that make it possible to find out the essence, meaning and purpose of preventing an administrative offense connected with corruption, including in the activities of civil servants. One of the elements of such an integrated sphere of prevention of corruption-related administrative offenses is restrictions and prohibitions imposed by law on civil servants. On the one hand, their existence may in some way influence the full implementation of their rights by civil servants (for example, as individuals), but, on the other hand, they establish the foundation for preventing corruption in the civil service system, which is a positive component of the complex of actions, aimed at the existence of a legal, legal, stable, efficient civil service system. Therefore, the issue of limitation and prohibitions in the field of prevention of corruption-related administrative offenses, as well as legal and procedural aspects of their application, assumes the urgency and importance of thorough research. Turning to the terminology of the law, one can find the concept of “limitations” or “prohibitions” in various spheres (administrative, criminal, civil, legal, labor, etc.), but a legal definition that would reflect the real meaning and essence of such concepts, is not fixed by the normative. The article analyzes in detail the positions of scientists regarding the essence of these concepts and proposes an author’s version of the understanding of their content. There are a number of features that are inherent in restrictions and prohibitions as means of preventing an administrative offense related to corruption.

Authors and Affiliations

A. N. Shimon

Keywords

Related Articles

LEGAL MEANS OF FORMING LEGAL CULTURE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS

The article is devoted to theoretical and practical aspects of the formation of the legal culture of law enforcement officers. The concepts of the legal culture of society, the legal culture of the individual and legal e...

TAX SYSTEMS OF THE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES: NOTES TO THE SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION

Due to the fact that Ukraine chose a course on European integration, the adjustment of the tax system of our country should be made taking into account the requirements of the European space, principles of the constructi...

РОЛЬ ВЕНЕЦІАНСЬКОЇ КОМІСІЇ В РЕФОРМУВАННІ ПРОКУРАТУРИ УКРАЇНИ НА СУЧАСНОМУ ЕТАПІ

Стаття присвячена дослідженню конституційно-правових і міжнародно-правових аспектів діяльності Венеціанської комісії щодо розробки та впровадження європейських стандартів у діяльність органів прокуратури сучасних європей...

ПРОЦЕДУРНА ФУНКЦІЯ В АСПЕКТІ ПОШУКУ НОВОЇ МОДЕЛІ СИСТЕМИ ФУНКЦІЙ АДМІНІСТРАТИВНОГО ПРАВА УКРАЇНИ

У статті приділена увага теорії процесуальних функцій окремих видів юридичних процесів, що дало змогу прослідкувати загальну тенденцію традиційного виокремлення функцій класичних процесуальних галузей права та «відібрати...

ДЕРЖАВНА ІДЕОЛОГІЯ ТА ЇЇ ОСНОВНІ ОЗНАКИ В ІМПЕРСЬКУ ДОБУ (КІНЕЦЬ ХVІII – ПОЧАТОК ХХ СТ.): ІСТОРИКО-ПРАВОВИЙ ВИМІР

Cтаття присвячена дослідженню державної ідеології скрізь історичну призму. Аналізується сутність державної ідеології та її основні ознаки в імперську добу. У хронологічній послідовності з кінця XVIІІ до початку XХ ст. пр...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP439454
  • DOI -
  • Views 69
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

A. N. Shimon (2017). DEFINITION OF THE ESSENCE OF THE CONCEPTS “LIMITATIONS” AND “PROHIBITIONS” IN THE FIELD OF WARNING OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENSES RELATED TO CORRUPTION. Вісник Запорізького національного університету. Юридичні науки, 4(), 79-86. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-439454