НОРМАТИВНО-ПРАВОВЕ РЕГУЛЮВАННЯ ТА ПСИХОЛОГІЧНІ АСПЕКТИ ПРИЙНЯТТЯ СЛІДЧИМ СУДДЕЮ РІШЕННЯ ЩОДО НАДАННЯ ДОЗВОЛУ НА ПРОВЕДЕННЯ НЕГЛАСНИХ СЛІДЧИХ (РОЗШУКОВИХ) ДІЙ
Journal Title: Південноукраїнський правничий часопис - Year 2018, Vol 4, Issue 2
Abstract
The article researches the legal regulation of the participants’ activities in criminal proceedings during the consideration of the petition as for giving permission to carry out some secret investigations, taking into account the principles of the presumption of innocence and adversarial parties and analyzes the psychological aspects of the investigating judge’s decision to give permission to hold secret investigative actions. A great attention is paid to the fact that while checking the legitimacy, legality and justification of the investigative authorities’ need to obtain evidence by conducting secret investigative actions, the investigating judge should form his/her own opinion. At the same time, the doctrinal understanding of his/her own opinion as such a state of consciousness of the judge, when he/she considering the available evidence sufficient to address the question of the existence or absence of facts included in the subject of evidence, is confident in the correctness of his/her conclusion and is ready for practical action in accordance with the gained knowledge , also obliges to consider the depth of the investigation in such circumstances that should convince him/her in the possibility of giving permission to carry out secret investigative (search) action. The guideline for the content of an investigating judge’s decision to give permission to carry out secret investigators actions, and thus to list issues for which the investigating judge should form his/her own opinion, should serve as a list of circumstances that the law obliges to indicate, in the relevant, the petition of the investigator and the prosecutor (Part 2 of Article 248 of the CCP). That is, in the decision of the investigating judge, the judge’s assessment of all the circumstances which are in the petition of the investigator, the prosecutor, as from the point of view of their completeness (taking into account the requirements of Part 2 of Article 248 of the CPC), and in view of their motivation, reasonableness and persuasiveness in a particular situation. The expediency of involving the consideration of the petition for giving permission to carry out some secret investigations (searches) of a lawyer, who, according to the instructions of the Bar Association, will give a legal assessment to the arguments of the initiator of the restriction of the person’s rights as a representative of the community but not of a concrete person.
Authors and Affiliations
Ю. В. Меркулова, І. С. Казарян
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP608266
- DOI -
- Views 54
- Downloads 0
ІНСТИТУТИ ЗАБЕЗПЕЧЕННЯ РЕАЛІЗАЦІЇ ПРАВ ЛЮДИНИ І РЕЛІГІЙНОЇ СВОБОДИ
The article examines the institutional framework for the realization of human rights and religious freedom. It has been established that the main institutions are government bodies, judicial bodies and civil society inst...
ЄВРОПЕЙСЬКИЙ ПРИНЦИП ПОВАГИ ДО ПРИВАТНОГО ЖИТТЯ В КОНТЕКСТІ ЗАХИСТУ ПЕРСОНАЛЬНИХ ДАНИХ ОСОБИ
The work is devoted to the study of international legal regulation of protection and protection of personal data. In particular, the legal framework devoted to the security of information about citizens in the countries...
ОСОБЛИВОСТІ ПСИХОЛОГІЧНОЇ ПІДГОТОВКИ ПРАЦІВНИКІВ ПАТРУЛЬНОЇ ПОЛІЦІЇ ДО ДІЯЛЬНОСТІ В ЕКСТРЕМАЛЬНИХ І НАДЗВИЧАЙНИХ СИТУАЦІЯХ
In this scientific article, the features of the psychological training of patrol police officers for activities in extreme and dangerous conditions are investigated. The measures and components of the general psychologic...
ФІКСАЦІЯ ТА ОЦІНКА РЕЗУЛЬТАТІВ СЛІДЧОГО ЕКСПЕРИМЕНТУ
The article is devoted to the detailed consideration of the features of fixation and evaluation of the results of the investigator experiment. The main way of fixing the results of an investigator’s experiment is to comp...
A question of honour protection, dignity and personal inviolability of a person is recognized as an actual question of development of modern democratic society.
Providing of person’s existence, his/her development in the modern world stipulates the necessity of problem decision of the legal fixing and providing of right on personal inviolability and sets off it to the number of...