Validity and reproducibility of the Powertap P1 power meter when compared with SRM device

Journal Title: Journal of Science and Cycling - Year 2016, Vol 5, Issue 2

Abstract

The use of power meters allows the assessment of cycling performance according to the record power profile [1]. Some power meters allow the measurement of power output (PO) in the pedals such as Look Keo Power (Look, Cedex, France) [2] and Garmin Vector (Olathe, USA) [3]. However, the results about these two systems [2, 3] should be treated with some caution given the presence of mean differences between them and the SRM (Schoberer Rad Messtechnich, Julich, Germany) who is the most widespread device due to his high validity, sensibility and reproducibility. The usefulness of the Look Keo Power pedals may be limited by the poorer agreement of the data compared with those of the SRM [2]. Also, it has been shown that the Garmin Vectors pedals 1) under estimated the PO during sprints with low gear ratio and 2) does not have acceptable sensitivity. Powertap P1 (PP1, CycleOps, Madison, USA) is a newer power meter located in the pedals for which the usage characteristics have not been analysed. The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reproducibility of the PP1 power meter during laboratory cycling tests compared with SRM device.

Authors and Affiliations

M. Czajkowski| EA4660, C3S Health - Sport Department, Sports University, Besancon, France, A. Bouillod| EA4660, C3S Health - Sport Department, Sports University, Besancon, France.French Cycling Federation, Saint Quentin en Yvelines, France, A. Dauriannes| EA4660, C3S Health - Sport Department, Sports University, Besancon, France, G. Soto-Romero| ISIFC, Université de Franche-Comté, France; 5 LAAS-CNRS, Toulouse, France, F. Grappe| Professional Cycling Team FDJ, Moussy le Vieux, France

Keywords

Related Articles

The relationship between vertical leg stiffness and gross mechanical efficiency in cyclists

Background: Professional cyclists have been shown to have a mechanical efficiency that is 11% higher compared to amateur cyclists (Coyle et al. 1991: Med Sci Sports Exerc, 23 (1), 93-107). The variations in power between...

A measurement system for the bicycle crank angle using a wireless motion sensor attached to the crank arm

In this study, we propose a system for measuring the rotational angle of a bicycle crank arm. This system consists of a wireless motion sensor with bi-axial acceleration and angular velocity sensors attached to the crank...

Rehabilitation of a tibial plateau fracture within an elite female mountainbiker. A case report

Tibial plateau fractures present a challenging problem for elite athletes and medical personnel, with many athletes failing to return to previous sporting levels post fracture (Johansson etal, 1992). An elite professiona...

Effects of a seven day period of high-intensity training on performance and physiology of competitive cyclists

Background: Competitive endurance cyclists commonly undertake periods of intensified overload training in the weeks prior to major competitions in order to bring themselves to optimal levels of fitness. Purpose: In this...

Vibration exposure on cobbles sectors during ParisRoubaix

Paris-Roubaix is a unique and singular race of UCI World Tour. Compared to other “classic races”, the difficulty of the route is increased by the mechanical vibrations encountered during many cobbles sectors. These ones...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP2962
  • DOI -
  • Views 367
  • Downloads 20

How To Cite

M. Czajkowski, A. Bouillod, A. Dauriannes, G. Soto-Romero, F. Grappe (2016). Validity and reproducibility of the Powertap P1 power meter when compared with SRM device. Journal of Science and Cycling, 5(2), 9-10. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-2962